For a parent struggling to understand why a public school has not received its promised funding, a farmer demanding answers about a stalled irrigation project, or a family seeking clarification over the allocation of public land, information can mean the difference between helplessness and justice.
For a taxpayer wondering how millions of shillings allocated to a development project were spent, the unanswered question is often the same: Who is responsible, where did the money go, and why is nobody explaining? Hamisi Yusuf
Across Kenya, citizens' ability to hold public officials accountable often depends on whether they can obtain reliable information from the very institutions expected to serve them.
It is against this backdrop that Kenya has gazetted a new Access to Information Policy, 2026, renewing the spotlight on citizens' right to know what their government is doing, how public resources are being used, and why decisions affecting their lives are made.
But beyond the official language of transparency and governance lies a fundamental test: Will the new policy make it easier for ordinary Kenyans to obtain answers from public offices, or will access to information remain a constitutional promise that is difficult to enforce in practice?
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE RIGHT TO KNOW
Published under Gazette Notice No. 15992 in the Kenya Gazette of October 9, 2026, the policy was issued by the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy.
The framework seeks to strengthen transparency, accountability, and public participation in governance by reinforcing citizens' ability to obtain information held by public institutions.
It places access to information at the center of democratic governance, the protection of rights, and the responsibility of public institutions to explain their decisions and actions.
In his foreword, Information, Communications, and the Digital Economy, Cabinet Secretary William Kabogo Gitau describes access to information as a fundamental human right and a critical pillar of democracy and good governance.
The policy signals a renewed commitment to making government institutions more open, responsive, and accountable to the people they serve.
For citizens who have struggled to obtain records, understand public decisions, or establish how government programs are implemented, the significance of the framework will ultimately depend on how effectively it translates these principles into practice.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROMISE
At the heart of the policy is Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya, which guarantees every citizen the right of access to information held by the State.
The constitutional provision also recognizes the right to information held by another person where that information is required for the exercise or protection of a right or fundamental freedom. In addition, the State is required to publish and publicize important information affecting the nation.
These guarantees recognize that citizens cannot meaningfully participate in governance when information about public decisions, expenditure, and policies remains inaccessible.
A community cannot effectively question a development project without understanding its budget and implementation status. Residents cannot scrutinize the management of public resources if relevant records are withheld. Nor can citizens make informed decisions about their leaders when important information is unavailable.
Access to information is therefore not merely an administrative procedure. It is a practical instrument through which citizens can exercise their constitutional rights and demand accountability.
The new policy seeks to reinforce this principle by providing a framework for improving access to information and strengthening the institutions responsible for making it available.
WHEN INFORMATION BECOMES A TOOL OF JUSTICE
Consider a community whose residents suspect that a promised road project has stalled despite the allocation of public funds.
Without access to relevant records, residents may struggle to establish the amount budgeted, the contractor engaged, the implementation timetable, or the reasons for the delay.
With meaningful access to such information, they can ask more precise questions, challenge unexplained decisions, and seek intervention through the appropriate oversight mechanisms.
The same principle applies to families seeking information about public services, businesses pursuing government contracts, journalists investigating alleged misuse of public funds, and civil society organizations monitoring development programs.
Information can expose administrative failures, clarify misunderstandings, and help distinguish substantiated allegations from speculation.
It can also protect public officials against unfounded accusations by making decisions and supporting records available for scrutiny.
For investigative journalists, access to information is particularly important. Documents, expenditure records, official correspondence, and administrative decisions can provide the evidence needed to establish what happened, who was responsible, and whether public resources were used for their intended purposes.
However, access to information alone does not guarantee accountability. Information must be accurate, available in a usable form, and released in time to make a difference. Where wrongdoing is established, the relevant oversight and enforcement institutions must also be capable of responding.
LINKING KENYA TO GLOBAL TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS
The policy also aligns Kenya's access-to-information framework with international commitments and national development priorities, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and Kenya Vision 2030.
Sustainable Development Goal 16 promotes peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions.
Its Target 16.10 calls on countries to ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms in accordance with national legislation and international agreements.
Indicator 16.10.2 specifically measures the adoption and implementation of constitutional, statutory, and policy guarantees for public access to information.
Kenya's new policy consequently forms part of a broader governance agenda that recognizes transparency as an essential ingredient of public trust and institutional effectiveness.
Yet the existence of a policy document is only one part of the equation. Its impact will depend on whether public institutions consistently comply with applicable access-to-information requirements and whether citizens know how to exercise their rights.
THE IMPLEMENTATION TEST
The central challenge is turning policy commitments into everyday administrative practice.
For many citizens, dealing with public offices can be intimidating, particularly when they do not know which institution holds the information they need, how to make a formal request, or what steps to take when their request goes unanswered.
The policy's success will therefore depend on practical measures that make information accessible to people across different social and economic backgrounds.
Public institutions need clear procedures for receiving and responding to information requests. Citizens need to understand their rights, while public officers need to know their obligations.
Timely responses, accessible records, effective complaint mechanisms, and appropriate oversight will be critical to ensuring that the right to information is not confined to legislation and official statements.
Digital platforms may also improve access, but online publication alone cannot guarantee inclusion. Citizens without reliable internet access or digital skills must not be left behind.
Public institutions should therefore consider how information can be made available through multiple channels, using language and formats that ordinary citizens can understand.
Equally important is the need to distinguish legitimate restrictions on disclosure from unnecessary secrecy. Any refusal to provide information must be assessed under the applicable constitutional and legal framework rather than used as a convenient way to avoid public scrutiny.
FROM TRANSPARENCY TO ACCOUNTABILITY
The deeper promise of the Access to Information Policy, 2026, lies in its potential to change the relationship between citizens and the state.
In a functioning democracy, public institutions do not merely exercise authority; they must also explain how that authority is used.
When citizens can access information, they are better positioned to participate in public debates, scrutinize development priorities, and question decisions that affect their livelihoods.
When journalists can obtain relevant records, investigations can move beyond rumor and speculation towards evidence-based reporting.
When communities understand how public projects are funded and implemented, they can engage more effectively with officials and oversight institutions.
But transparency must lead somewhere. Information that exposes a problem but produces no response may deepen public frustration rather than restore confidence.
The ultimate measure of success will therefore be whether the policy helps citizens obtain meaningful answers, enables public institutions to correct failures, and strengthens mechanisms for holding decision-makers accountable.
THE RIGHT TO KNOW MUST WORK FOR EVERY KENYAN.
The gazettement of the new policy marks an important development in Kenya's continuing effort to strengthen transparency and public participation.
Its real significance, however, will not be determined by the language of the Gazette Notice or the promises contained in its foreword.
It will be measured in the experiences of ordinary Kenyans: the farmer seeking answers about an agricultural program, the parent questioning the management of public school resources, the resident demanding an explanation for a stalled road project, and the taxpayer asking how public money was spent.
For these citizens, access to information is not an abstract debate about governance. It is a means of understanding decisions that affect their daily lives.
The challenge now is to ensure that the new framework delivers more than a formal commitment to openness.
Ultimately, the right to know must become the right to receive meaningful answers. And when those answers reveal failures or wrongdoing, transparency must be accompanied by accountability.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.